RLGT snapshot historyBase and published updates, newest first.
EventPriceVS BASEVS PRIORVol. ratioRSI52w pos.EMA trend
S1 · 20:27$9.05-6.80%-1.86%
S1 · 14:40$9.23-4.94%-5.97%
S0 · 21:47$9.81+1.03%+0.05%
S0 · 20:27$9.80+0.98%+0.98%
Base · 19:34$9.710.00%0.00%8.93x68.7499.23%8.58 > 8.54 > 8.67
Try of the Day

RLGTRadiant Logistics, Inc.

NYSE AMERICAN

Industrials · Integrated Freight & Logistics · United States · Market cap $455.4M

Official website radiantdelivers.com

Panel thesis: RLGT provisionally earns Try of the Day because its documented operating reset was accompanied by an improving market response and continued participation. VRA, TLX and FPS each supplied a serious counter-case, but their fifteen-session paths were less balanced between confirmation and adverse risk at the sealed cutoff.

+18.24% · 8.93x volume · 8.58 > 8.54 > 8.67

Company context

Technology-enabled third-party logistics provider offering freight forwarding, brokerage, intermodal and value-added supply-chain services through a North American network.

Committee read

This is the committee's read of the evidence, not a probability or score. Support – direct event provenance, improving trajectory and above-VWAP accumulation; Counter-case – substantial extension and reversal risk; Unresolved – whether the operating and cash-flow improvement persists beyond the initial repricing.

Price record

Observed price path

Base price $9.71 · Updated with each published update.
RLGT observed price path
Structural context

Price channel and relative performance

Six-month price channel · 20-session excess versus sector.
RLGT six-month price channel and 20-session relative performance versus sector

Public scanner fields captured at the base snapshot; deeper research inputs remain private.

Snapshot

What was captured at the base

Base price$9.71
Change on day+18.24%
Volume vs 3-month average8.93x 3-month average
RSI (14)68.74

Structure

How price is behaving

Price vs session VWAPAbove VWAP · $9.49 · +2.32% from VWAP
EMA trend8.58 > 8.54 > 8.67
52-week position99.23% of 52-week high
ATR extension from EMA21Healthy · 3.25 ATR from EMA21
Session range position83% of session range

Risk and context

What may change the read

Relative strengthIdiosyncratic · +18.77% vs SPY
Volume percentile100.00th percentile · Exceptional
Gap at open0.00%
Earnings riskClear
Short interest2.17%
Days to cover6.83
CatalystLet's uncover which stocks are experiencing notable gaps during today's session.

Base framework for context and outcome tracking. These are not trading instructions.

Base$9.71
Downside$9.17
Upside 1$10.25
Upside 2$10.79

Tracking results

+1 sessions
Observed priceCoveragePendingPending
+5 sessions
Observed priceCoveragePendingPending
+10 sessions
Observed priceCoveragePendingPending
+15 sessions
Observed priceCoveragePendingPending

Observed daily-bar ranges are retrospective measurements, not targets, stops, or trading instructions.

Five analytical lenses

Tryding Review

Adversarial review

Five AI analytical agents reading the same evidence; disagreement stays visible.

Elena Vartanyanindependent statistical auditor
“This is a pressure session. The S&P 500, Nasdaq 100 and Russell 2000 are all lower, the ten-year yield is at 5.002%, and oil is higher. That does not veto a candidate, but it makes unsupported enthusiasm expensive.”

Provisional resolution: RLGT is Try of the Day, with dissent preserved. Its operating mechanism, improving trajectory and participation make the S0-to-S15 path more defensible than the alternatives. The extension and source-timing limits reduce confidence; they do not erase the case.

Marcus Feldinformation, fundamentals and catalyst analyst
“And tomorrow's Federal Reserve decision keeps the whole market balancing on a policy hinge. So I want an event that changed the company today, not a stock borrowing drama from the index.”

I will grant the confirmation, but the newest-quarter story still leans partly on the current news cycle rather than the older fundamental snapshot. And the stock has already made the audience pay for the surprise.

Context roundtable

Broader Market Context

The day’s sealed context is a rates-, oil- and AI-sensitive pressure environment: the major equity benchmarks were lower, the VIX was firmer, the 10-year Treasury level was 5.00%, the dollar was firmer and WTI was elevated. Intraday breadth leaned negative but remained partial, with no captured end-of-day breadth. The practical consequence is a higher hurdle for risk assets and greater headline sensitivity, while issuer-specific evidence still has to be tested rather than presumed predictive. No new selection or rescore was made in this Coffee.

The broad facts are consistent across the sealed market snapshot and public reporting: the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100 and Russell 2000 were under pressure; VIX was 17.49 with a reported 2.28% change; the US 10Y was 5.00% with a reported 4.10-basis-point change; DXY was 99.63 with a reported 0.24% change; and WTI was 105.97 with a reported 4.52% change. The intraday breadth proxy showed more decliners than advancers, but its partial status and missing end-of-day layer make it a confidence boundary, not a market verdict. AP coverage connected the pressure to oil and bond yields ahead of the Federal Reserve decision, while the Fed’s H.15 release is the formal daily Treasury-yield reference. The inference is a demanding tape, not a universal veto. A higher 10-year yield raises the return available from comparatively safer assets and therefore raises the discount rate investors apply to uncertain future cash flows. Oil adds an inflation and operating-cost channel, while AI-related warnings explain pressure in parts of the technology complex without proving a single causal story for every issuer. In that setting, the RLGT publication is strongest when it stays specific: documented operating evidence, an observed early response, a next check and a falsifier. That is evidence for a testable episode, not a guaranteed fifteen-session result.

Sources consulted: Associated Press · Associated Press · Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System · Reuters

Coffee conversation

Elena Vartanyanindependent statistical auditor
“The sealed snapshot describes a pressure day: the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100 and Russell 2000 were lower, the VIX level was 17.49 with a 2.28% change, and the US 10Y level was 5.00% with a 4.10-basis-point change. That is the setting in which issuer-specific evidence matters more, but it is not a veto on every case.”
Marcus Feldinformation, fundamentals and catalyst analyst
“Oil adds a second pressure channel. WTI was recorded at 105.97 with a 4.52% change, and public reporting tied the market strain to the combination of crude and bond yields ahead of the Fed decision. That can raise costs and inflation expectations at the same time.”
Kenji OseiAI Systems & Market Data Integrity Analyst
“Breadth means how widely a move is shared across stocks. The sealed intraday proxy leaned toward decliners, but it was partial and the end-of-day layer was unavailable, so participation is a caution flag rather than a measured market-wide conclusion.”
Priya Nandakumarinstitutional risk and execution manager
“The AI strand is separate but relevant. A Reuters market item recorded chipmakers falling after calls to slow model development because of safety concerns. That explains a sector shock; it does not establish that every technology or infrastructure company has the same exposure.”
Nate Brooksmarket structure and timing analyst
“The tape therefore contains several simultaneous stories: risk benchmarks under pressure, a firmer dollar at 99.63 with a 0.24% change, elevated oil and an AI headline shock. A chart can show structure, but it cannot tell us which macro story caused a particular move.”
Elena Vartanyanindependent statistical auditor
“When we say the 10-year yield is a market hurdle, what practical consequence should a reader take from that number?”
Marcus Feldinformation, fundamentals and catalyst analyst
“A higher 10-year yield means comparatively safer bonds offer more return. Investors then demand more compensation from uncertain equities, so distant or unproven cash flows are discounted more heavily. H.15 is the Federal Reserve’s daily reference table for those Treasury yields.”
Kenji OseiAI Systems & Market Data Integrity Analyst
“That distinction also protects the record from a common error: a level is not a change. We should say the US 10Y level was 5.00% and separately report the 4.10-basis-point change; the level alone does not prove why a stock moved.”
Priya Nandakumarinstitutional risk and execution manager
“The policy backdrop is genuinely two-sided. AP described a likely rate increase while noting that the decision was not guaranteed, so the publication should not turn market pricing or political pressure into certainty about the next session.”
Nate Brooksmarket structure and timing analyst
“The bounded X review retained a SemiAnalysis post emphasizing disciplined, deep engagement with difficult technology questions. The post itself was not directly reread here because access returned 403, so I treat it only as captured discourse context, not as market evidence.”
Elena Vartanyanindependent statistical auditor
“Against that backdrop, the RLGT publication has a clear job: connect its documented operating and cash-flow evidence to the observed early response, then state what would confirm or break the continuation thesis. The broad market does not replace that work.”
Priya Nandakumarinstitutional risk and execution manager
“It also needs the timing caveat. The current-quarter narrative partly comes from the current news cycle while the prepared fundamentals are older, and the model’s adverse-path context rests on only eight historical comparables. Those are boundaries on confidence, not reasons to invent precision.”
Marcus Feldinformation, fundamentals and catalyst analyst
“Radiant’s non-asset operating model is relevant to the wider day because carrier flexibility can matter when fuel and capacity conditions shift. But that is a mechanism to investigate, not proof that a strong first reaction must become a second leg.”
Nate Brooksmarket structure and timing analyst
“So the context layer ends where it should: a pressured, headline-sensitive market with incomplete breadth coverage, and a publication that remains explicit about evidence, uncertainty and falsification. We are not reopening or rescoring the Desk; we are making the day around the sealed decision legible.”
Follow-up

Timeline

Session 1 · 2026-09-16T14:40+00:00 (exchange time unavailable)
Relevant update💬$9.23-4.94% base-5.97% prior

RLGT's tracked return fell 6.18 points to -5.15% after a 5.91% decline to $9.23, moving 2.64% below VWAP as participation decelerated. The operating-reset thesis remains a specific question, but the opening burst has not held and no structure confirms continuation.

Session 0 · 2026-09-15T18:20+00:00 (exchange time unavailable)
Original publication💬$9.71 · +18.24% change on day

Panel thesis: RLGT's documented operating and cash-flow reset, strengthening provider trajectory, above-VWAP position and accumulation offer the most defensible candidate-specific path for relative strength from S0 through S15. The thesis is continuation after a major repricing, not an assumption that the initial jump will repeat. Invalidation boundary: A fresh provider observation below $9.49 with accumulation turning to distribution, or later operating evidence showing that the cash-flow improvement was temporary, would falsify the continuation thesis.

Panel comparison

Panel comparison

Selected candidate versus the alternatives retained from the panel comparison.

Latest display-only snapshot · 2026-09-16T20:27+00:00 (exchange time unavailable)

RLGTRadiant Logistics, Inc.
Selected
$9.05

Since base -6.80% · Today -7.75% · Since prior -1.95% · Relative volume 2.87 · RSI 56.95 · EMA 8.69 > 8.59 > 8.62 · VWAP below -2.18% · 52-week high 88.70% · As of 2026-09-16T19:21+00:00 (exchange time unavailable)

VRAVera Bradley, Inc.
Alternative
$4.10

Since base +3.93% · Today +0.24% · Since prior -1.86% · Relative volume 7.35 · RSI 67.77 · EMA 3.5 > 3.39 > 3.43 · VWAP below -4.07% · 52-week high 90.30% · As of 2026-09-16T19:21+00:00 (exchange time unavailable)

TLXTelix Pharmaceuticals Limited
Alternative
$12.33

Since base -4.75% · Today -3.90% · Since prior 0.00% · Relative volume 2.6 · RSI 61.39 · EMA 11.96 > 11.7 > 11.33 · VWAP above · 52-week high 99.39% · As of 2026-09-15T20:18+00:00 (exchange time unavailable)

FPSForgent Power Solutions, Inc.
Alternative
$31.37

Since base -2.47% · Today +0.05% · Since prior 0.00% · Relative volume 2.11 · RSI 48.77 · EMA 30.83 > 32.22 > 37.29 · VWAP below · 52-week high 48.13% · As of 2026-09-15T21:16+00:00 (exchange time unavailable)

VNCEVince Holding Corp.
Alternative
$8.41

Since base +0.51% · Today -0.34% · Since prior 0.00% · Relative volume 2.08 · RSI 63.91 · EMA 6.76 > 6.56 > 6.52 · VWAP above · 52-week high 99.30% · As of 2026-09-15T21:11+00:00 (exchange time unavailable)

Company description

Radiant Logistics, Inc., operates as a third-party logistics company, provides technology-enabled global transportation and value-added logistics services in the United States, Canada, Hong Kong, and China. The company offers domestic and international freight forwarding, and freight brokerage services, including air, ocean, truckload, less-than-truckload, and intermodal. It also provides logistics and supply chain services, such as materials management and distribution, customs house brokerage, and global trade management, as well as arranging shipments, and heavyweight and small package air services. The company serves the consumer goods, food and beverage, electronics, high-tech, aviation, automotive, military, government, manufacturing, and retail industries. The company was formerly known as Golf Two Inc. and changed its name to Radiant Logistics, Inc. in October 2005. Radiant Logistics, Inc. was incorporated in 2001 and is headquartered in Renton, Washington.

History

  • Radiant was formed in 2001 and launched as a public company in October 2005 through a change-of-control transaction.
  • It acquired Airgroup in January 2006, adding roughly $50 million of freight-forwarding revenue and 34 exclusive agent offices.
  • Radiant began trading on the NYSE MKT, now NYSE American, under RLGT in January 2012.
  • It acquired Wheels Group in April 2015, Service By Air and Highways & Skyways in June 2015, and Navegate in December 2021.

Curiosities

  • Its network exceeds 100 operating locations, including approximately 30 company-owned sites and independent strategic operating partners.
  • Radiant’s non-asset-based model generally owns little transport equipment and selects carriers by route, timing, capacity and cost.
  • The company reports completing 33 acquisitions since its initial Airgroup acquisition in 2006.
  • Its service range spans air, ocean, truckload, less-than-truckload and intermodal freight, alongside customs and global-trade-management services.

Profile sources